Los Angeles Board of Harbor Commissioners
Harbor Administration Building
425 S. Palos Verdes Street
San Pedro, California 90731
Harbor Administration Building
425 S. Palos Verdes Street
San Pedro, California 90731
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 2021 AT 9:00 AM
Board of Harbor Commissioners
President Jaime L. Lee
Vice President Edward R. Renwick
Commissioner Diane L. Middleton
Commissioner Lucia Moreno-Linares
Commissioner Anthony Pirozzi, Jr.
ORDER OF BUSINESS
OPEN SESSION
A. Roll Call
B. Executive Director Remarks
C. Comment from the Public on Non-Agenda Items
D. Report from the Neighborhood Council Representatives – An opportunity for a Neighborhood Council to present a Resolution or Motion filed with the Los Angeles Harbor Department to be presented to the Board as it relates to any agenda item being considered or under the purview of the Harbor Department.
E. Reports of the Commissioners
F. Board Committee Reports
- Alameda Corridor Transportation Authority Governing Board Meeting of August 12, 2021
G. Approval of the Minutes
None.
H. Presentation
- Retirements
I. Level I Coastal Development Permit
None.
J. Board Reports of the Executive Director
Consent Items (1 – 7)
Government Affairs
Summary: Staff requests approval of an Agreement for state government advocacy services in Sacramento, California for the City of Los Angeles Harbor Department (Harbor Department) with Shaw Yoder Antwih Schmelzer & Lange, Inc. The proposed Agreement is for a one-year term with two one-year options to extend, for a total of up to three years, with a three-year not-to-exceed amount of $403,200, which is $134,400 per year, and a monthly fee of $11,200. The Harbor Department is financially responsible for payment of expenses incurred under the proposed Agreement.
Recommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has determined that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines; (2) find that in accordance with the Los Angeles City Charter (Charter), Section 1022, work under the subject Agreement is temporary in nature and can be performed more feasibly by an independent contractor rather than by City of Los Angeles (City) employees; (3) approve the proposed Agreement with Shaw Yoder Antwih Schmelzer & Lange, Inc. The proposed Agreement is for a one-year term with two one-year options to extend, for a total of up to three years, with a three-year not-to-exceed amount of $403,200, which is $134,400 per year, and a monthly fee of $11,200; (4) authorize the Executive Director to execute, and the Board Secretary to attest to, the proposed Agreement; and (5) adopt Resolution No.____________.
Port Pilots
Summary: Staff requests approval of a third temporary order amending Port of Los Angeles Tariff No. 4 (Tariff), Section Three, Item No. 370 – Vessel Traffic Service User Fees (VTSUF). The Marine Exchange of Southern California (MX) operates a Vessel Traffic Service (VTS) that monitors vessel traffic within and approaches to the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach (the Ports). The VTS provides mariners with timely, relevant, and accurate information for the purpose of safe, secure, efficient, reliable, and environmentally sound maritime transportation. VTSUF are assessed on a monthly basis for local vessels such as tugs and tows, ferries, commercial rescue and emergency vessels, and whale watch boats. For non-local entry vessels, VTSUF are assessed based upon a vessel’s gross tons (GT) and length over all (LOA) upon arrival at the Ports. Currently, monthly VTSUF on local vessels range from $30 - $355 per month. VTSUF on non-local entry vessels currently range from $236 - $500 per visit based upon LOA, and non-local entry vessels also pay an additional tonnage fee of $0.0032 per GT per visit. Non-local entry vessels with an LOA of 340 meters or more are currently subject to the maximum LOA fee of $500 per visit. Effective April 1, 2021, the proposed amendment would increase the VTSUF range on local vessels on a one-time basis by anywhere from $5 to $40 to a proposed range of $35 - $395 per month. For non-local entry vessels, the proposed amendment would apply an annual 10.5% increase to LOA and GT fees, effective each April 1 for three years. In addition, the maximum LOA fee would be applied to non-local entry vessels with an LOA of 335 meters or more. After the proposed three (10.5% each) increases are applied, by April 1, 2023, the LOA fee range would increase to $318 - $675 per visit (relative to the current $236 - $500 per visit). In addition, the GT fee in effect as of April 1, 2023 would be $0.0043 (relative to the current $0.0032 per GT). As VTSUF are paid directly to MX, there is no financial impact to the Harbor Department associated with this action. During calendar year 2023, the Marine Exchange will re-evaluate whether any additional fee increases would be necessary over the subsequent five-year period. At the February 18, 2021, Board meeting, the Board approved a Temporary and Permanent Order amending Port of Los Angeles Tariff No. 4, Item No. 370. At the June 3, 2021, Board meeting, the Board approved a second Temporary Order amending Port of Los Angeles Tariff No. 4, Item No. 370 – Traffic Service User Fees. Changes in the Tariff require City Council approval. The City Council has not calendared and approved the Permanent Order and Ordinance. Therefore, a third Temporary Order is proposed to allow additional time for the Permanent Order to pass through the City Council approval process. This third Temporary Order, if approved, will expire 90 days after the day it is published or upon execution of the Permanent Order by the City Council, whichever occurs first.
Recommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has determined that the proposed action is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article III Class 1(31) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines; (2) approve the Amendment to the Port of Los Angeles Tariff No. 4, revising Section Three Pilotage, Item No. 370 – Vessel Traffic Service User Fees, subject to the California Association of Port Authorities’ review and approval, and authorize the Executive Director to work with California Association of Port Authorities to secure this approval or proceed to take independent action in accordance with the California Association of Port Authorities procedure; (3) adopt Temporary Order No.____________ - to amend Section Three Pilotage, Item No. 370, Vessel Traffic Service User Fees in the Port of Los Angeles Tariff No. 4; (4) authorize the Board Secretary to certify to the adoption of the Temporary Order by the Board of Harbor Commissioners and cause the same to be published once in a newspaper printed and published in the City of Los Angeles, to take effect prior to adoption by Ordinance for a period not-to-exceed 90 days pursuant to City Charter Section 653(b); and (5) adopt Resolution No._____________.
Port Pilots
Summary: Staff requests approval of a third temporary order to temporarily amend the current Port of Los Angeles Tariff No. 4 (Tariff), Section Three, Item No. 330 – Charges for Pilotage. The City of Los Angeles Harbor Department (Harbor Department) provides the piloting service that is required by all vessels, 300 gross tons and over, calling at the Port of Los Angeles. Each vessel is subject to a tariff that is assessed on a vessel’s gross registered tons (GRT) and the length over all (LOA), plus a general assessment for capital improvements, maintenance and training (Surcharge per Move). The proposed amendment would: (i) incorporate a five-step increase, affecting all fee schedules related to pilotage; (ii) increase the 2nd pilot fee from 50% to 100%; and (iii) include a draft surcharge (Draft Surcharge) assessed to each vessel requiring pilotage at an initial level of $6.00 per foot. Effective April 1, 2021, the GRT would increase to $0.00665, the fee attributable to LOA would initially increase by 5.6 percent, and the Surcharge per Move would increase to $110.88. Effective, January 1, 2022, the Draft Surcharge would increase to $12.00 per foot, and all other fee schedules related to pilotage would again increase 5.6 percent. Effective, January 1, 2023, and each January 1, thereafter, all fees schedules related to pilotage would increase by 5.6 percent. During calendar year 2025, the Harbor Department will re-evaluate whether any additional fee increases would be necessary over the subsequent five-year period. At the March 18, 2021, Board meeting, the Board approved a Temporary and Permanent Order amending Port of Los Angeles Tariff No. 4, Item No. 330 – Charges for Pilotage. At the June 3, 2021, Board meeting, the Board approved a second Temporary Order amending Port of Los Angeles Tariff No. 4, Item No. 330 – Charges for Pilotage. Changes in the Tariff require City Council approval. The City Council has not calendared and approved the Permanent Order and Ordinance. Therefore, a third Temporary Order is proposed to allow additional time for the Permanent Order to pass through the City Council approval process. This third Temporary Order, if approved, will expire in 90 days after the day it is published or upon execution of the Permanent Order by the City Council, whichever occurs first.
Recommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has determined that the proposed action is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article III Class 1(31) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines; (2) approve the Amendment to the Port of Los Angeles Tariff No. 4, to revise Section Three Pilotage, Item Nos. 330 (b), (d), (e), (f), and (g), and add Item No. 330 (h) for draft surcharge, subject to the California Association of Port Authorities’ review and approval, and authorize the Executive Director to work with the California Association of Port Authorities to secure this approval or proceed to take independent action in accordance with the California Association of Port Authorities procedure; (3) adopt Temporary Order No. ____________ - to amend Section Three Pilotage. Item Nos. 330 (b), (d), (e), (f), (g), and add Item No. 330 (h) to include a draft surcharge in the Port of Los Angeles Tariff No. 4; (4) authorize the Board Secretary to certify to the adoption of the Temporary Order by the Board of Harbor Commissioners and cause the same to be published once in a newspaper printed and published in the City of Los Angeles, to take effect prior to adoption by Ordinance for a period not-to-exceed 90 days pursuant to City Charter Section 653(b); and (5) adopt Resolution No.____________.
Cargo Marketing
Summary: Staff requests approval of a third Temporary Order to amend (Amendment) Port of Los Angeles (Port) Tariff No. 4 (Tariff) Section Twenty-Three, “Incentives - General Rules and Regulations”, Item No. 2325 “Ocean Common Carrier Incentive Program.” The proposed amendment removes the “but not zero” container volume reference in the Qualifying Year period of the Ocean Common Carrier (OCC) Incentive program (Program), retroactive to September 1, 2018, and removes the qualifying year as an eligibility requirement effective April 1, 2021. Removing the qualifying year requirement would adjust the program in response to the unforeseen COVID-related decrease in container volume during Fiscal Year (FY) 2020. The “but not zero” container volume reference in the Qualifying Year did not consider OCCs that had not brought any container volume to the Port in the two years preceding their arrival, nor did it recognize OCCs that had very limited market participation and then dramatically increased container volumes through the Port, effectively “New Market Entrants”. Eligible OCCs can earn a financial incentive that could amount to $10.00 per incremental Twenty-foot Equivalent Units (TEU) and a maximum payout of $2,000,000 per OCC per Incentive Period as stated in Tariff No. 4 Item No. 2325. Payouts to OCCs earned under the terms of the proposed OCC Incentive Program are the financial responsibility of the Harbor Department. Changes in the Tariff require City Council approval. At the May 6, 2021, Board of Harbor Commissioners (Board) meeting, the Board approved a Temporary and Permanent Order amending Port Tariff No. 4 Item No. 2325. A second Temporary Order was approved at the June 17th Board meeting to allow additional time for the Permanent Order to pass through the City Council approval process. The City Council has yet to calendar and approve the Permanent Order and Ordinance. Therefore, a third Temporary Order is needed. The third Temporary Order, if approved, will expire in 90 days after the day it is published or upon execution of the Permanent Order by the City Council, whichever occurs first.
Recommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has determined that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines; (2) adopt Temporary Order No.____________ to amend Port of Los Angeles Tariff No. 4, Section Twenty-Three, “Incentives - General Rules and Regulations”, Item No. 2325 “Ocean Common Carrier Incentive Program”; (3) authorize the Board Secretary to certify the adoption of the Temporary Order by the Board of Harbor Commissioners and cause the same to be published once in a newspaper printed and published in the City of Los Angeles, to take effect prior to adoption by Ordinance for a period not-to-exceed 90 days pursuant to City Charter Section 653(b); and (4) adopt Resolution No.____________.
Waterfront & Commercial Real Estate
Summary: Staff requests approval of the First Amendment (Amendment) to the Communications Site Lease Agreement No. 18-3599 (Lease) between the City of Los Angeles Harbor Department (Harbor Department) and the Santa Catalina Island Conservancy (Catalina). The current Lease grants the Harbor Department access to space on a communications tower located on Santa Catalina Island. The tower space is utilized for the housing of a radio transmitter for the Los Angeles Port Police (Port Police) radio communications system. Space in an adjacent building is also leased to place additional radio system components. This transmitter location assists in providing significant radio coverage to Port Police in areas outside the breakwater. The proposed Amendment is to extend the original term an additional three years, with payment of $4,630.50 per month in the first year and annual five percent increases thereafter. The amendment also requires a $2,000.00 security deposit. This tower space rental amount and the annual increases are standard terms offered for this use by Catalina to all radio transmitter tenants. A total of $175,171.82 would be spent by the Harbor Department on this proposed Amendment over its three-year term.
Recommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has determined that the proposed action is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article III Class 1(14) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines; (2) approve the proposed First Amendment to the Communications Site Lease; (3) authorize the Executive Director to execute and the Board Secretary to attest to the Lease Agreement; and (4) adopt Resolution No.____________.
Office of the City Attorney
Summary: The proposed action involves the Board’s approval of a requested waiver of a potential conflict of interest from the law firm Meyers Nave and its proposed hiring of an attorney who provided legal representation to the Department while employed at another law firm. Meyers Nave represents a client in a litigation matter in which the Department is also a party. Because of the attorney joining Meyers Nave, the firm will establish an ethical wall to prevent the attorney from participating on relevant matters, accessing files or discussing the matters with other staff or attorneys.
Recommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has determined that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under Article II Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines; (2) formally waive any potential conflicts that might arise by way of Meyers Nave hiring an attorney who previously worked on the same matter for the Department; (3) authorize the City Attorney’s Office to execute a written conflict waiver; and (4) adopt Resolution No.____________.
Human Resources
Summary: Staff requests approval of the technical amendments to Resolution No. 21-9861 and No. 21-9862. On July 15, 2021, the Board of Harbor Commissioners (Board) adopted Resolution No. 21-9861 and No. 21-9862, approving merit pay and cost of living adjustments to the salary of Executive Director Eugene D. Seroka. The proposed amended resolutions conform with the technical requirements of Charter Section 604(b) and the guidelines for general manager salary adjustments promulgated by the Director of the Office of Administrative and Research Services (known as the City Administrative Officer). The Harbor Department is financially responsible for payments of expenses under the amended resolutions.
Recommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has determined that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines; (2) approve the amended Resolution No. 21-9861 and No. 21-9862 to conform with the technical requirements and guidelines for general manager salary adjustments; and (3) adopt Resolution No.____________.
Regular Items (8 - 11)
Cargo & Industrial Real Estate
Summary: Staff requests that the Board of Harbor Commissioners authorize the Executive Director to require Yang Ming Transport Corporation (Yang Ming) furnish a surety bond up to the amount of $3,492,800 in connection with its restoration obligations under Permit No. 787 (Permit). The Permit expires October 10, 2021, and the proposed surety bond will provide additional financial security to the Harbor Department to ensure that Yang Ming completes restoration activities required under the Permit. Yang Ming will be financially responsible for furnishing the proposed surety bond.
Recommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has determined that the proposed action is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article III Class 1(18(d)) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines; (2) authorize the Executive Director to Require a Surety Bond from Yang Ming under Permit No. 787 in the amount of up to $3,492,800; and (3) adopt Resolution No.___________.
Cargo & Industrial Real Estate
Summary: Staff requests approval and issuance of Permit No. 953 (Permit 953) between Everglades Company Terminal, Inc. (Everglades) and the City of Los Angeles Harbor Department (Harbor Department), and approval of a guaranty of that Permit furnished by Terminal Investment Limited Holding SA (TIL). The Permit allows Everglades to operate a marine container terminal at Berths 121 to 127. The term of the proposed Permit is three years. The Permit will yield a minimum of $26,039,623 in the first year, followed by annual three percent increases thereafter on the minimum annual guarantee and rent due for the on-dock rail facility, plus $137,412 per year for office space at rates set forth in the Tariff. The proposed award of Permit 953 arises from a public competitive solicitation process that commenced on June 1, 2021, and closed on June 30, 2021, in which two proposals were received, analyzed and reviewed, and scored by a review panel consisting of Harbor Department and other City of Los Angeles personnel. That public competitive process ultimately resulted in staff’s determination that Everglades was the superior proposer, as detailed below.
Recommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has determined that the proposed action is administratively and categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article III Class 1(14) and Article II Section 1 of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines; (2) find that entering into this Permit No. 953 is in the best interest of the City of Los Angeles despite certain exceptions to the City of Los Angeles Harbor Department’s Leasing Policy, Section XI, concerning a 2 percent holdback on security instruments for a maintenance fund and Section VIII concerning the rate of return policy; (3) approve Permit No. 953 with Everglades Company Terminal, Inc.; (4) approve the Guaranty provided by Terminal Investment Limited Holding SA; (5) authorize the Executive Director to execute and the Board Secretary to attest to Permit No. 953; (6) authorize the Executive Director to execute and the Board Secretary to attest to the parent guaranty provided by Terminal Investment Limited Holding SA; and (7) adopt Resolution No.___________.
Office of the City Attorney
Summary: The Office of the City Attorney (Office) requests approval of the Third Amendment to Agreement No. 19-3668 (Third Amendment) between the City Los Angeles Harbor Department (Harbor Department) and Nossaman LLP (Nossaman). The proposed Third Amendment extends the term of the Agreement by two years for a maximum term of five years with no change in compensation. The current three-year term expires on July 19, 2022. The proposed Amendment would extend the term of the Agreement to a proposed five years and an expiration date of July 19, 2024. The additional term is necessary due to ongoing litigation support related to an appeal of the federal case identified as United States District Court Case No. 2:20-cv-03251-PSG-MAA entitled Harbor Performance Enhancement Center, LLC v. City of Los Angeles Harbor Department, et al. and a new state court action identified as Superior Court Case No. 21STCV15500 entitled Harbor Performance Enhancement Center, LLC v. City of Los Angeles Harbor Department. The Harbor Department is financially responsible for payment for legal services rendered under Agreement No. 19-3668.
Recommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has determined that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines; (2) find in accordance to Charter Section 1022 that the scope of work of the proposed Agreement can be more economically and feasibly provided by an independent contractor than by City employees; (3) approve the Third Amendment to Legal Services Agreement No. 19-3668 with Nossaman LLP, to extend the term by two years for a maximum term of five years; (4) authorize and direct the Board Secretary to forward the Third Amendment to the City Council for its approval pursuant to Section 373 of the City Charter and Section 10.5 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code; (5) authorize the Executive Director and Board Secretary to execute and attest to the Third Amendment; and (6) adopt Resolution No.____________.
Office of the City Attorney
Summary: The Office of the City Attorney (Office) requests approval of the First Amendment to Agreement No. 20-3742 (First Amendment) between the City Los Angeles Harbor Department (Harbor Department) and Crowell and Moring LLP (Crowell). The proposed First Amendment extends the term of the Agreement by one year for a maximum term of four years and increases the maximum compensation authority by $200,000 for a total maximum compensation of $500,000. The current three-year term expires on May 13, 2023. The proposed Amendment would extend the term of the Agreement to a proposed four years and an expiration date of May 13, 2024. The additional term is necessary due to ongoing litigation support related to an appeal of the federal case identified as United States District Court Case No. 2:20-cv-03251-PSG-MAA entitled Harbor Performance Enhancement Center, LLC v. City of Los Angeles Harbor Department, et al. and a new state court action identified as Superior Court Case No. 21STCV15500 entitled Harbor Performance Enhancement Center, LLC v. City of Los Angeles Harbor Department. The Harbor Department is financially responsible for payment for legal services rendered under Agreement No. 20-3742.
Recommendation: Board resolve to (1) find that the Director of Environmental Management has determined that the proposed action is administratively exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II Section 2(f) of the Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines; (2) find in accordance to Charter Section 1022 that the scope of work of the proposed Agreement can be more economically and feasibly provided by an independent contractor than by City employees; (3) approve the First Amendment to Legal Services Agreement No. 20-3742 with Crowell and Moring LLP, to extend the term by one year for a maximum term of four years and increase the compensation authority by $200,000 for a maximum compensation authority of $500,000; (4) authorize and direct the Board Secretary to forward the First Amendment to the City Council for its approval pursuant to Section 373 of the City Charter and Section 10.5 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code; (5) authorize the Executive Director and Board Secretary to execute and attest to the Third Amendment; and (6) adopt Resolution No.____________.
K. Closed Session
1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
(Subdivision (d)(1) of Government Code Section 54956.9)
Fast Lane Transportation, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Contra Costa Superior
Court Case No. CIVMSN14-0300 consolidated with Case Nos. CIVMSN14-0308,
CIVMSN14-0309, CIVMSN14-0310, CIVMSN14-0311, CIVMSN14-0312, and
CIVMSN14-0313
2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
(Subdivision (d)(1) of Government Code Section 54956.9)
Natural Resources Defense Council, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BS070017
3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
(Subdivision (d)(1) of Government Code Section 54956.9
Natural Resources Defense Council, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2021-00023385-CU-TT-CTL
4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
(Subdivision (d)(2) of Government Code Section 54956.9)
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (d)(2) of Section 54956.9:
(three cases)
5. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – INITIATE LITIGATION
(Subdivision (d)(4) of Government Code Section 54956.9)
Initiation of litigation pursuant to subdivision (d)(4) of Section 54956.9: (one case)
6. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
(Government Code Section 54956.8)
Provide instructions to its real estate negotiators with respect to Permit 999 with China Shipping Holding Company, Ltd.:
Property: Berths 100-103, San Pedro
City Negotiator: Michael DiBernardo
Tenant Negotiator: Paul Nazzaro
Negotiating Parties: City and China Shipping Holding Company, Ltd.
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
7. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
(Government Code Section 54956.8)
Provide instructions to its real estate negotiators with respect to a proposed permit with Port of Los Angeles Boys & Girls Club:
Property: 100 West 5th Street, San Pedro
City Negotiator: Michael Galvin
Tenant Negotiator: Mike Lansing
Negotiating Parties: City and Port of Los Angeles Boys & Girls Club
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
8. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
(Government Code Section 54956.8)
Provide instructions to its real estate negotiators with respect to Permit 900 with WWL Vehicle Services Americas, Inc.:
Property: 500 East Water Street, Wilmington
City Negotiator: Marisa Katnich
Tenant Negotiator: Peter Bresnee
Negotiating Parties: City and WWL Vehicle Services Americas, Inc.
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
9. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
(Government Code Section 54956.8)
Provide instructions to its real estate negotiators with respect to a successor permit with City of Los Angeles Department of Recreation & Parks:
Property: 3720 Stephen M. White Drive, San Pedro
City Negotiator: Michael Galvin
Tenant Negotiators: Noel Williams & Crislyn McKerron
Negotiating Parties: City and City Department of Recreation & Parks
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
10. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
(Government Code Section 54956.8)
Provide instructions to its real estate negotiators with respect to Permit 692 with Yusen Terminals, LLC:
Property: Berths 212-223, Terminal Island
City Negotiators: Michael DiBernardo, Marisa Katnich
Tenant Negotiator: Alan McCorkle
Negotiating Parties: City and Yusen Terminals, LLC
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
11. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
(Government Code Section 54956.8)
Provide instructions to its real estate negotiators with respect to a proposed permit with San Pedro Fish Market:
Property: Berths 93C, D, E, San Pedro
City Negotiator: Eugene D. Seroka
Tenant Negotiator: Michael Ungaro
Negotiating Parties: City and San Pedro Fish Market
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
L. Adjournment